↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert view

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert view
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Lehane, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Cliona O’Riordan, Eileen Savage, Jonathan Drennan, Colm O’Tuathaigh, Michael O’Connor, Mark Corrigan, Francis Burke, Martina Hayes, Helen Lynch, Laura Sahm, Elizabeth Heffernan, Elizabeth O’Keeffe, Catherine Blake, Frances Horgan, Josephine Hegarty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 442 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 16%
Student > Bachelor 66 15%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Lecturer 22 5%
Researcher 21 5%
Other 86 19%
Unknown 150 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 136 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 17%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 156 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,311,142
of 22,083,610 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#157
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,199
of 423,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,083,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.