You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emphysematous cystitis with clinical subcutaneous emphysema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1865-1380-4-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed-Ramadan Sadek, Helen Blake, Anand Mehta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 86% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#289
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,536
of 125,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.