↓ Skip to main content

Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas

Overview of attention for book
Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas…
IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 231)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
115 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas
Published by
International Union for Conservation of Nature, August 2018
DOI 10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.pag.28.en
ISBNs
978-2-83-171917-7, 978-2-83-171920-7
Authors

Rachel A. Neugarten, Penny F. Langhammer, Elena Osipova, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Nirmal Bhagabati, Stuart H.M. Butchart, Nigel Dudley, Vittoria Elliott, Leah R. Gerber, Claudia Gutierrez Arrellano, Kasandra-Zoica Ivanić, Marianne Kettunen, Lisa Mandle, Jennifer C. Merriman, Mark Mulligan, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Darius J. Semmens, Sue Stolton, Simon Willcock, Neugarten, Rachel A., Langhammer, Penny F., Osipova, Elena, Bagstad, Kenneth J., Bhagabati, Nirmal, Butchart, Stuart H.M., Dudley, Nigel, Elliott, Vittoria, Gerber, Leah R., Gutierrez Arrellano, Claudia, Ivanić, Kasandra-Zoica, Kettunen, Marianne, Mandle, Lisa, Merriman, Jennifer C., Mulligan, Mark, Peh, Kelvin S.-H., Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara, Semmens, Darius J., Stolton, Sue, Willcock, Simon, Groves, Craig, Neugarten, Rachel A, Langhammer, Penny F, Butchart, Stuart H M, Gutierrez-Arrellano, Claudia, Merriman, Jennifer C, Peh, Kelvin S-H

Editors

Craig Groves

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 26 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#202,986
of 14,021,570 outputs
Outputs from International Union for Conservation of Nature
#5
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,630
of 370,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Union for Conservation of Nature
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.