↓ Skip to main content

Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas

Overview of attention for book
Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas…
IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 708)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
169 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services: guidance for Key Biodiversity Areas, natural World Heritage sites, and protected areas
Published by
International Union for Conservation of Nature, August 2018
DOI 10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.pag.28.en
ISBNs
978-2-83-171917-7, 978-2-83-171920-7
Authors

Rachel A. Neugarten, Penny F. Langhammer, Elena Osipova, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Nirmal Bhagabati, Stuart H.M. Butchart, Nigel Dudley, Vittoria Elliott, Leah R. Gerber, Claudia Gutierrez Arrellano, Kasandra-Zoica Ivanić, Marianne Kettunen, Lisa Mandle, Jennifer C. Merriman, Mark Mulligan, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Darius J. Semmens, Sue Stolton, Simon Willcock, Neugarten, Rachel A., Langhammer, Penny F., Osipova, Elena, Bagstad, Kenneth J., Bhagabati, Nirmal, Butchart, Stuart H.M., Dudley, Nigel, Elliott, Vittoria, Gerber, Leah R., Gutierrez Arrellano, Claudia, Ivanić, Kasandra-Zoica, Kettunen, Marianne, Mandle, Lisa, Merriman, Jennifer C., Mulligan, Mark, Peh, Kelvin S.-H., Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara, Semmens, Darius J., Stolton, Sue, Willcock, Simon, Groves, Craig, Neugarten, Rachel A, Langhammer, Penny F, Butchart, Stuart H M, Gutierrez-Arrellano, Claudia, Merriman, Jennifer C, Peh, Kelvin S-H, Ivanić, Kasandra-Zorica

Editors

Craig Groves

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 355 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Master 64 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 69 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 143 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 5%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 93 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#269,543
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from International Union for Conservation of Nature
#18
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,746
of 336,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Union for Conservation of Nature
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.