↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis, X-ray diffraction structure, spectroscopic properties and antiproliferative activity of a novel ruthenium complex with constitutional similarity to cisplatin

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthesis, X-ray diffraction structure, spectroscopic properties and antiproliferative activity of a novel ruthenium complex with constitutional similarity to cisplatin
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, March 2009
DOI 10.1039/b822725j
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanja Grguric-Sipka, Iryna N. Stepanenko, Jelena M. Lazic, Caroline Bartel, Michael A. Jakupec, Vladimir B. Arion, Bernhard K. Keppler

Abstract

The light-protected reaction of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(II)Cl(2)](2) with 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine in dry methanol, followed by addition of excess NH(4)PF(6), afforded the complex [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(II)(NH(3))(2)Cl](PF(6)) () in 47% yield. Attempts to use the same protocol for the synthesis of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Os(II)(NH(3))(2)Cl](PF(6)) led to the isolation of the binuclear triply methoxido-bridged arene-osmium compound [{(eta(6)-p-cymene)Os}(2)(mu-OCH(3))(3)](PF(6)) (). Both compounds were characterised by X-ray crystallography and (1)H NMR spectroscopy, and the ruthenium complex also by spectroscopic techniques (IR and UV-vis spectroscopies). The antiproliferative activity of complex in vitro was studied in A549 (non-small cell lung carcinoma), CH1 (ovarian carcinoma), and SW480 (colon carcinoma) cells and compared to that of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(II)(en)Cl](PF(6)) (). In contrast to the latter compound, is only modestly cytotoxic in all three cell lines (IC(50): 293-542 muM), probably due to the instability of the diammine ruthenium complex in aqueous solution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2009.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#8,211
of 21,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,404
of 108,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#46
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,061 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.