You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007419.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianni Virgili, Mariacristina Parravano, Jennifer R Evans, Iris Gordon, Ersilia Lucenteforte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 275 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 106 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,075,504
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,394
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,820
of 360,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.