You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The HDAC3–SMARCA4–miR-27a axis promotes expression of the PAX3:FOXO1 fusion oncogene in rhabdomyosarcoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Signaling, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scisignal.aau7632 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narendra Bharathy, Noah E Berlow, Eric Wang, Jinu Abraham, Teagan P Settelmeyer, Jody E Hooper, Matthew N Svalina, Yoshihiro Ishikawa, Keith Zientek, Zia Bajwa, Martin W Goros, Brian S Hernandez, Johannes E Wolff, Michelle A Rudek, Linping Xu, Nicole M Anders, Ranadip Pal, Alexandria P Harrold, Angela M Davies, Arya Ashok, Darnell Bushby, Maria Mancini, Christopher Noakes, Neal C Goodwin, Peter Ordentlich, James Keck, Douglas S Hawkins, Erin R Rudzinski, Bishwanath Chatterjee, Hans Peter Bächinger, Frederic G Barr, Jennifer Liddle, Benjamin A Garcia, Atiya Mansoor, Theodore J Perkins, Christopher R Vakoc, Joel E Michalek, Charles Keller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 83% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#591,403
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Science Signaling
#181
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,969
of 448,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Signaling
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.