↓ Skip to main content

Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial
Published in
Appetite, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Pechey, Emma Cartwright, Mark Pilling, Gareth J. Hollands, Milica Vasiljevic, Susan A. Jebb, Theresa M. Marteau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#830,780
of 15,934,618 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#574
of 3,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,279
of 390,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#12
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,934,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.