↓ Skip to main content

Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial
Published in
Appetite, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Pechey, Emma Cartwright, Mark Pilling, Gareth J. Hollands, Milica Vasiljevic, Susan A. Jebb, Theresa M. Marteau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Unspecified 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Other 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#644,865
of 13,722,278 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#507
of 3,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,878
of 352,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#11
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,722,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.