↓ Skip to main content

Establishing spatial and temporal patterns in Microcystis sediment seed stock viability and their relationship to subsequent bloom development in Western Lake Erie

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Establishing spatial and temporal patterns in Microcystis sediment seed stock viability and their relationship to subsequent bloom development in Western Lake Erie
Published in
PLoS ONE, November 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0206821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine M. Kitchens, Thomas H. Johengen, Timothy W. Davis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#412,336
of 13,920,927 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#7,390
of 146,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,978
of 366,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#36
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,920,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.