You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Genevieve McArthur, Yumi Sheehan, Nicholas A Badcock, Deanna A Francis, Hua-Chen Wang, Saskia Kohnen, Erin Banales, Thushara Anandakumar, Eva Marinus, Anne Castles
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||18||82%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||51||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||38||11%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||29||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||39||12%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||27||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 348,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.