↓ Skip to main content

Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009115.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevieve McArthur, Yumi Sheehan, Nicholas A Badcock, Deanna A Francis, Hua-Chen Wang, Saskia Kohnen, Erin Banales, Thushara Anandakumar, Eva Marinus, Anne Castles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 35 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,095,096
of 15,488,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,037
of 11,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,046
of 387,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,488,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.