↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Triagem auditiva de crianças com síndrome congênita pelo vírus Zika atendidas em Fortaleza, Ceará, 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Triagem auditiva de crianças com síndrome congênita pelo vírus Zika atendidas em Fortaleza, Ceará, 2016
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000400002
Pubmed ID
30427400
Authors

Rebeka Ferreira Pequeno Leite, Marinisi Sales Aragão Santos, Erlane Marques Ribeiro, André Luiz Santos Pessoa, Doris Ruthy Lewis, Célia Maria Giacheti, Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti

Abstract

to describe the results of hearing screening performed in children with Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome (CZS) in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. this was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving children with CZS receiving health care in Fortaleza, 2016; the hearing screening tests performed were immittance audiometry, transient otoacoustic emissions (TOAE), acoustic reflexes, and cochleopalpebral reflex (CPR). The study included 45 children with an average age of 10 months. 44 of them underwent tympanometric screening, with 16 of these having the right ear within the normal range and 22 having the left ear within the normal range. Among the 43 children evaluated by TOAE, 30 "passed" in both ears, nine "refered" in both ears and four "refered" just in ear; 13/43 "refered" and needed to repeat screening. 43 children evaluated by CPR, 37 showed responses. most of the children evaluated had completed cochlear function and middle ear results refer in compatible with their age range.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Linguistics 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,367,271
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#118
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,635
of 351,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.