You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individuals' experiences of involuntary admissions and preserving control: qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJPsych Open, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjo.2018.59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David McGuinness, Kathy Murphy, Emma Bainbridge, Liz Brosnan, Mary Keys, Heike Felzmann, Brian Hallahan, Colm McDonald, Agnes Higgins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Ireland | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,652,321
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from BJPsych Open
#485
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,209
of 317,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJPsych Open
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.