↓ Skip to main content

Effects of life history and reproduction on recruitment time lags in reintroductions of rare plants

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of life history and reproduction on recruitment time lags in reintroductions of rare plants
Published in
Conservation Biology, January 2019
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew A. Albrecht, Oyomoare L. Osazuwa‐Peters, Joyce Maschinski, Timothy J. Bell, Marlin L. Bowles, William E. Brumback, Janice Duquesnel, Michael Kunz, Jimmy Lange, Kimberlie A. McCue, A. Kathryn McEachern, Sheila Murray, Peggy Olwell, Noel B. Pavlovic, Cheryl L. Peterson, Jennifer Possley, John L. Randall, Samuel J. Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Environmental Science 3 21%
Unspecified 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,854,090
of 14,110,318 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,618
of 2,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,665
of 372,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.