↓ Skip to main content

Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy. By Katherine Benton-Cohen

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social History, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy. By Katherine Benton-Cohen
Published in
Journal of Social History, November 2018
DOI 10.1093/jsh/shy104
Authors

Hidetaka Hirota

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,166,313
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social History
#219
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,222
of 450,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social History
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.