↓ Skip to main content

Safety and immunogenicity, after nasal application of HIV-1 DNA gagp37 plasmid vaccine in young mice

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and immunogenicity, after nasal application of HIV-1 DNA gagp37 plasmid vaccine in young mice
Published in
Vaccine, April 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorma Hinkula, Marie Hagbom, Britta Wahren, Ulf Schroder

Abstract

There is a need for safe and potent adjuvants capable of delivering vaccine candidates over the mucosal barrier, with good capacity to stimulate both mucosal and systemic cell-mediated and humoral immunity. An adjuvant aimed for intranasal delivery should preferably deliver the antigen and minimize the transfer into the close proximity of the central nervous system, thus avoiding damage on the olfactory tissues. Advantages with a mucosal delivery route would be to provide mucosal and systemic immunity, requiring lower vaccine doses then when given parentally. The aim of this study was to study if the N3 adjuvant intranasally administered with HIV DNA plasmids would be transferred into the olfactory tissues and cause local inflammation and tissue damage.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 42%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#7,437
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,746
of 91,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#70
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.