↓ Skip to main content

How do medical students value health on the EQ-5D? Evaluation of hypothetical health states compared to the general population

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do medical students value health on the EQ-5D? Evaluation of hypothetical health states compared to the general population
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-6-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria-Theresa Barbist, Daniela Renn, Bianca Noisternig, Gerhard Rumpold, Stefan Höfer

Abstract

Medical students gain a particular perspective on health problems during their medical education. This article describes how medical students value 10 hypothetical health states using the EQ-5D compared to the general population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,182,340
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#826
of 2,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,916
of 179,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.