↓ Skip to main content

Blue Endorsements Matter: How the Fraternal Order of Police Contributed to Donald Trump’s Victory

Overview of attention for article published in PS, Political Science & Politics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters
Title
Blue Endorsements Matter: How the Fraternal Order of Police Contributed to Donald Trump’s Victory
Published in
PS, Political Science & Politics, November 2018
DOI 10.1017/s1049096518001841
Authors

Michael Zoorob

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#501,387
of 12,354,690 outputs
Outputs from PS, Political Science & Politics
#79
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,823
of 208,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PS, Political Science & Politics
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.