New COPE guidelines on publication process manipulation: why they matter

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, November 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 110)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
twitter: 39 tweeters

facebook: 2 Facebook pages
googleplus: 1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation: 6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 8 Mendeley

Summary Blogs Twitter Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 43 tweets from 39 users, with an upper bound of 103,274 followers.

RT @ragamouf: #scholarlysummit Discussion: Gaming the peer review process - recommended resource discussion https://t.co/WXLp8hY5kS

11 Feb 2019

Reply Retweet Favourite

RT @ragamouf: #scholarlysummit Discussion: Gaming the peer review process - recommended resource discussion https://t.co/WXLp8hY5kS

11 Feb 2019

Reply Retweet Favourite

#scholarlysummit Discussion: Gaming the peer review process - recommended resource discussion https://t.co/WXLp8hY5kS

11 Feb 2019

Reply Retweet Favourite

مقال خطير في التلاعب بإجراءات النشر في المجلات العلمية وإجراءات المراجعة للنشر . وتحديث توجيهات وارشادات منظمة النزاهة في النشر COPE https://t.co/f2mBtwZd2D

23 Dec 2018

Reply Retweet Favourite

This page shows the most recent tweets that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 39 additional tweets.