You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cause of death in patients with end‐stage renal disease: assessing concordance of death certificates with registry reports
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, August 2003
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2003.tb00420.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shu Qin Li, Alan Cass, Joan Cunningham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 67% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#1,065
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,620
of 53,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.