↓ Skip to main content

Validity of ultrasonography to assess hepatic steatosis compared to magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a criterion method in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of ultrasonography to assess hepatic steatosis compared to magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a criterion method in older adults
Published in
PLoS ONE, November 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207923
Authors

Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe, Soren Brage, Alison Sleigh, Francis Finucane, Simon J. Griffin, Nick J. Wareham, Ken K. Ong, Nita G. Forouhi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,185,256
of 14,045,330 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#38,563
of 147,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,466
of 371,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#83
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,045,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.