↓ Skip to main content

De-Neolithisation in southern Norway inferred from statistical modelling of radiocarbon dates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De-Neolithisation in southern Norway inferred from statistical modelling of radiocarbon dates
Published in
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.11.004
Authors

Svein Vatsvåg Nielsen, Per Persson, Steinar Solheim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,889,383
of 12,247,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
#94
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,629
of 151,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,247,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.