You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-018-0331-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flora Colledge, Sophie De Massougnes, Bernice Elger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,459,177
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#264
of 1,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,093
of 437,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.