↓ Skip to main content

Informing randomized clinical trials of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy to prevent recurrent childhood wheezing: A sample size analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Informing randomized clinical trials of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy to prevent recurrent childhood wheezing: A sample size analysis
Published in
Vaccine, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne A. Riddell, Niranjan Bhat, Louis J. Bont, William D. Dupont, Daniel R. Feikin, Deshayne B. Fell, Tebeb Gebretsadik, Tina V. Hartert, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Ruth A. Karron, Harish Nair, Robert C. Reiner, Ting Shi, Peter D. Sly, Renato T. Stein, Pingsheng Wu, Heather J. Zar, Justin R. Ortiz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Student > Master 6 23%
Unspecified 5 19%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Unspecified 9 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,411,918
of 13,171,980 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#1,112
of 11,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,666
of 327,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#26
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,171,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.