↓ Skip to main content

Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
572 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmj.k4738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna C Crocker, Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Adwoa Parker, Jennifer A Hirst, Alan Chant, Sophie Petit-Zeman, David Evans, Sian Rees

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 572 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 373 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Master 39 10%
Other 19 5%
Student > Bachelor 18 5%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 130 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Social Sciences 28 8%
Psychology 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 153 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#81,018
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,322
of 65,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,521
of 448,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#30
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.