You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of acute or chronic effects of epicatechin-rich and procyanidin-rich apple extracts on blood pressure and cardiometabolic biomarkers in adults with moderately elevated blood pressure: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqy139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy J Hollands, Henri Tapp, Marianne Defernez, Natalia Perez Moral, Mark S Winterbone, Mark Philo, Alice J Lucey, Mairead E Kiely, Paul A Kroon |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#19,141,166
of 23,717,467 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#11,461
of 12,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,228
of 352,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#76
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,717,467 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.