↓ Skip to main content

Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective

Overview of attention for article published in International Political Science Review, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective
Published in
International Political Science Review, November 2018
DOI 10.1177/0192512118806783
Authors

Pippa Norris

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 63%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#737,420
of 15,566,530 outputs
Outputs from International Political Science Review
#20
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,630
of 387,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Political Science Review
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,566,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.