You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unprecedented plant species loss after a decade in fragmented subtropical Chaco Serrano forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0206738 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramiro Aguilar, Ana Calviño, Lorena Ashworth, Natalia Aguirre-Acosta, Lucas Manuel Carbone, Guillermo Albrieu-Llinás, Miguel Nolasco, Adrián Ghilardi, Luciano Cagnolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,746,340
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,701
of 215,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,346
of 448,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#417
of 3,147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.