↓ Skip to main content

Virtual Reality and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: How Effective Is Their Combination for Upper Limb Motor Improvement?—A Meta‐Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PM&R, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virtual Reality and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: How Effective Is Their Combination for Upper Limb Motor Improvement?—A Meta‐Analysis
Published in
PM&R, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandeep K. Subramanian, Shreya S. Prasanna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 62 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Neuroscience 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 72 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,283,047
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from PM&R
#1,294
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,805
of 363,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PM&R
#29
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.