↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of a General RNA-Cleaving FANA Enzyme

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of a General RNA-Cleaving FANA Enzyme
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07611-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yajun Wang, Arlene K. Ngor, Ali Nikoomanzar, John C. Chaput

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Chemistry 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Unspecified 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,782,897
of 13,092,437 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#16,921
of 22,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,917
of 322,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3,373
of 4,157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,092,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.