↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of a General RNA-Cleaving FANA Enzyme

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of a General RNA-Cleaving FANA Enzyme
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07611-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yajun Wang, Arlene K. Ngor, Ali Nikoomanzar, John C. Chaput

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 26%
Chemistry 7 26%
Unspecified 3 11%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,420,870
of 13,505,887 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#16,256
of 24,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,335
of 343,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3,651
of 4,948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.