↓ Skip to main content

Shelved sovereignty or invalid sovereignty? The South China Sea negotiations, 1992–2016

Overview of attention for article published in The Pacific Review, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
Shelved sovereignty or invalid sovereignty? The South China Sea negotiations, 1992–2016
Published in
The Pacific Review, November 2018
DOI 10.1080/09512748.2018.1535520
Authors

Jiye Kim, Daniel Druckman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,529,736
of 13,017,042 outputs
Outputs from The Pacific Review
#81
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,162
of 319,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pacific Review
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,017,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.