You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Giant tortoise genomes provide insights into longevity and age-related disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-018-0733-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Víctor Quesada, Sandra Freitas-Rodríguez, Joshua Miller, José G. Pérez-Silva, Zi-Feng Jiang, Washington Tapia, Olaya Santiago-Fernández, Diana Campos-Iglesias, Lukas F. K. Kuderna, Maud Quinzin, Miguel G. Álvarez, Dido Carrero, Luciano B. Beheregaray, James P. Gibbs, Ylenia Chiari, Scott Glaberman, Claudio Ciofi, Miguel Araujo-Voces, Pablo Mayoral, Javier R. Arango, Isaac Tamargo-Gómez, David Roiz-Valle, María Pascual-Torner, Benjamin R. Evans, Danielle L. Edwards, Ryan C. Garrick, Michael A. Russello, Nikos Poulakakis, Stephen J. Gaughran, Danny O. Rueda, Gabriel Bretones, Tomàs Marquès-Bonet, Kevin P. White, Adalgisa Caccone, Carlos López-Otín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 18% |
| Spain | 19 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 7% |
| Germany | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Japan | 9 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 2% |
| Chile | 5 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 109 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 166 | 60% |
| Scientists | 100 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 268 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 726. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#28,244
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#87
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#506
of 447,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#7
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.