↓ Skip to main content

Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1177/0141076818815509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graham Paul Martin, Sarah Chew, Mary Dixon-Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,156,136
of 13,897,220 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#372
of 1,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,464
of 365,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.