↓ Skip to main content

Community-based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations - an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community-based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations - an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010578.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janicke Visser, Milla H McLachlan, Nicola Maayan, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 496 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 18%
Researcher 64 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 129 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 17%
Social Sciences 27 5%
Psychology 23 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 2%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 156 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,894,496
of 16,651,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,277
of 11,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,152
of 394,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.