↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
423 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Jaschinski, Christoph G Mosch, Michaela Eikermann, Edmund AM Neugebauer, Stefan Sauerland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 410 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 17%
Student > Postgraduate 56 13%
Student > Master 51 12%
Unspecified 50 12%
Researcher 45 11%
Other 150 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 273 65%
Unspecified 71 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 37 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,973,980
of 13,543,741 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,466
of 10,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,703
of 344,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,543,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.