↓ Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of HIV and sexual reproductive health interventions targeting sex workers: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 431)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost effectiveness of HIV and sexual reproductive health interventions targeting sex workers: a systematic review
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12962-018-0165-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Rinaldi, Aliasghar A. Kiadaliri, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 39 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,452,582
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#45
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,024
of 437,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.