↓ Skip to main content

Controls of the spatial variability of denitrification potential in nontidal floodplains of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controls of the spatial variability of denitrification potential in nontidal floodplains of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA
Published in
Geoderma, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.015
Authors

Alicia R. Korol, Gregory B. Noe, Changwoo Ahn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 43%
Unspecified 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Engineering 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,400,265
of 13,044,081 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#835
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,717
of 320,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#31
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,044,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.