You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combining different diagnostic studies of lymphatic filariasis for risk mapping in Papua New Guinea: a predictive model from microfilaraemia and antigenaemia prevalence surveys
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tropical Medicine and Health, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41182-018-0123-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alvaro Berg Soto, Zhijing Xu, Peter Wood, Nelly Sanuku, Leanne J. Robinson, Christopher L. King, Daniel Tisch, Melinda Susapu, Patricia M. Graves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 23% |
Researcher | 8 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,223,124
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Medicine and Health
#72
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,317
of 445,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Medicine and Health
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.