↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006922.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Stefanie Schmidt, Montse Ferrer, Ben Sayer, Samuel Waterson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Other 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,507,246
of 15,248,333 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,032
of 11,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,889
of 383,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,248,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.