You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of neutropenia on mortality of critically ill cancer patients: results of a meta-analysis on individual data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2076-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Quentin Georges, Elie Azoulay, Djamel Mokart, Marcio Soares, Kyeongman Jeon, Sandra Oeyen, Chin Kook Rhee, Pascale Gruber, Marlies Ostermann, Quentin A. Hill, Pieter Depuydt, Christelle Ferra, Anne-Claire Toffart, Peter Schellongowski, Alice Müller, Virginie Lemiale, Fabien Tinquaut, Aurélie Bourmaud, Michaël Darmon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 2 | 7% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Grenada | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 22% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,764,137
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,370
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,937
of 450,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.