You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011901.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Rubeta N Matin, Kai Yuen Wong, Roger Benjamin Aldridge, Alana Durack, Abha Gulati, Sue Ann Chan, Louise Johnston, Susan E Bayliss, Jo Leonardi‐Bee, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Colette O'Sullivan, Hamid Tehrani, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 332 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 118 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 135 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,850,563
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,955
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,992
of 450,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.