↓ Skip to main content

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Bosteels, Steffi van Wessel, Steven Weyers, Frank J Broekmans, Thomas M D'Hooghe, M Y Bongers, Ben Willem J Mol

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,668,759
of 12,271,878 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,898
of 8,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,172
of 155,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,271,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.