You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Marshall, Douglas G Altman, Roger L Holder, Patrick Royston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 403 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 23% |
| Researcher | 73 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 37% |
| Mathematics | 33 | 8% |
| Psychology | 29 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 72 | 17% |
| Unknown | 95 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,850,318
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#240
of 2,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,922
of 122,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.