↓ Skip to main content

Audiovisual quality impacts assessments of job candidates in video interviews: Evidence for an AV quality bias

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 370)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
55 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Audiovisual quality impacts assessments of job candidates in video interviews: Evidence for an AV quality bias
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41235-018-0139-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua L. Fiechter, Caitlan Fealing, Rachel Gerrard, Nate Kornell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 25%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#747,241
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#45
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,609
of 449,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.