↓ Skip to main content

Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009901.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinhard Strametz, Martin N Bergold, Tobias Weberschock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 33%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Unspecified 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 19 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,108,272
of 15,534,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,422
of 11,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,640
of 386,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,534,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.