↓ Skip to main content

Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Colette O'Sullivan, Rubeta N Matin, Hamid Tehrani, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,028,119
of 14,354,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,026
of 10,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,352
of 374,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,354,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.