↓ Skip to main content

Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Colette O'Sullivan, Rubeta N Matin, Hamid Tehrani, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#984,020
of 15,463,540 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,782
of 11,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,850
of 385,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,463,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.