↓ Skip to main content

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Daniel Saleh, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Lopa Patel, Rubeta N Matin, Colette O'Sullivan, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 34 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,431,318
of 15,462,738 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,818
of 11,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,262
of 385,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,462,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.