↓ Skip to main content

Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Matthew J Grainge, Naomi Chuchu, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Rubeta N Matin, David R Thomson, Kai Yuen Wong, Roger Benjamin Aldridge, Rachel Abbott, Monica Fawzy, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Fiona M Walter, Hywel C Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 43 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 50 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,446,180
of 15,565,939 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,829
of 11,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,380
of 386,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,565,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.