↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000210.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Gordon Gadsby, Michael Flowerdew

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Other 16 19%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,792,095
of 14,015,434 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,112
of 10,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,521
of 368,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,015,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.