↓ Skip to main content

Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie C-T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Dalveer Singh, John A Rophael, Chris Anthony, Mieke L van Driel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 22%
Student > Master 15 20%
Unspecified 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Unspecified 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,126,229
of 14,291,740 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,839
of 10,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,452
of 373,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,291,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.