You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barrier or stressor? The role of discrimination experiences in health service use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6267-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Billy Gazard, Zoe Chui, Lisa Harber-Aschan, Shirlee MacCrimmon, Ioannis Bakolis, Katharine Rimes, Matthew Hotopf, Stephani L. Hatch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,619,303
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,456
of 17,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,202
of 447,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#137
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.