You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Quantitative Approach to Book-Printing in Sweden and Finland, 1640–1828
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1080/01615440.2018.1526657 |
| Authors |
Mikko Tolonen, Leo Lahti, Hege Roivainen, Jani Marjanen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 9 | 35% |
| Sweden | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Librarian | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,881,078
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#15
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,544
of 451,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them